Cases, credentials and artefacts an auditor would recognise.

Three anonymised production cases closest in kind to the work we propose. Credentials that get vetted before the work starts. And samples of the artefacts we produce during delivery — not marketing collateral, the real thing.

Credentials

EU CommissionSelected AI expert · Women in Digital Forum
ManningTechnical reviewer · AI & data engineering
Ex-PepsiCo & DeloitteEnterprise AI & data at global scale
FSQS-UK&IRegistered supplier · ID 10101341
FSQS-NENorthern Europe · ID 20100065
D-U-N-S523941626 · Romania

Three cases, in production

Anonymised. Each in the same schema — context, what we built, what it measurably changed, what stayed with the client. Named contacts on request.

Case · regulated finance
AI Control under DORA at an EU financial services firm
Per-request audit trails · exit readiness · live case study on this site

Context

Authorised EU financial services firm, DORA Article 28 in scope, AI in the operational chain.

What we built

AI control layer over the production system: per-request audit trail, guardrails, exit-readiness pack.

Measured result

Passed audit review with zero compliance issues. Eight weeks to production.

What the client kept

The source code, the accuracy tests, the alert catalogue and the DORA-aligned artefacts — in the client's repository, ready for their next audit.

Case · one source of truth
US health-information network — data platform from scratch
Fragmented systems · one shared description · new products unlocked

Context

Several operational systems each held part of the picture in whatever shape each system used. Products the client wanted to launch were not feasible while the data stayed fragmented.

What we did

Pulled the same entity out of every system, agreed one shared description the whole organisation could work from, and kept the source systems in place.

Measured result

Products the client subsequently launched — and that had not been possible while the data stayed fragmented — went live on that platform.

What the client kept

The shared description, the pipelines that keep it accurate, and the rules that resolve disagreements — running under the client's operations team.

Case · failure that hides in plain sight
AI platform — catching silent failure at scale
Volumes too high to check by hand · plausible-looking wrong output

Context

Data pipelines feeding machine-learning models at volumes where nobody can spot-check the output. The failures that hurt are the ones that look plausible and are wrong.

What we did

Built the layer that watches pipelines and models for exactly that failure mode — the one where the dashboard is green and the answer is wrong.

Measured result

Model behaviour became traceable to the exact data behind it. When a number moved, the team knew whether the model changed, the data changed, or something else.

What the client kept

The measurement discipline. Silent failure stopped being invisible and started being a category the team owned.

Case · enterprise scale
Enterprise data warehouse at Deloitte
Terabytes · professional-services rigour

Context

Built from scratch, ordinary in kind, demanding in scale and setting — volumes at which an inefficient transformation is unaffordable rather than merely slow.

What we built

Pipelines processing terabytes into the warehouse. Every design decision documented, reviewed and defended before it was built.

Measured result

Deliverable at professional-services quality bars, with an audit trail on every architectural choice.

What stayed

The warehouse, the pipelines and the review record — the standard the client kept using.

On request: a divisional reporting platform at PepsiCo, and the architectural rebuild of a production LLM platform where the technical team was led into a target architecture that cut deployment time and maintenance cost.

Sample artefacts

The artefacts we produce during delivery, in the shape they are actually delivered in. Anonymised. Fragments only — enough for your architects to know what to expect.

Architecture

Architecture annex page — with [assumption] markers

One page from an architecture annex, showing how we mark assumptions and name the section that closes each one. The gap we are not dressing up.

Evaluation

Evaluation harness report — with reliability diagram

Per-field accuracy, calibration reporting, cost-per-request-type reported alongside accuracy. What the harness looks like at the pilot gate.

Compliance

Compliance pack — table of contents

The regulator-, auditor- and works-council-ready artefacts we produce during delivery. GoBD Verfahrensdokumentation section, AI Act classification, DORA ICT-register entries.

Request the sample pack Reply within 24 hours, from an EU-hosted mailbox. No US processor is used to receive the request.

Book an architecture review.

45 minutes. One process, one obligation, one system-of-record boundary — mapped honestly against your evidence, not against a demo.

Book a review